CapX2020 frequently asked questions
1.
Can you tell me more about CapX2020?
2. Why are these lines being proposed?
3. Where will the energy that flows on the new
lines come from?
4. Will wind energy be on the new lines?
5. Who will benefit from the transmission improvements?
6. How will I find out if my property potentially is affected?
7. How can I get involved?
8. What can landowners who host any new transmission lines
expect in the form of compensation?
9. What do transmission structures look like?
10. Will the new lines be safe?
11. What about EMF?
12. Why not build the new lines underground?
13. When will the lines be built?
14. How much will the lines cost? Will my bills go up?
1. Can you tell me more about
CapX2020?
CapX2020 is a joint initiative
of 11 transmission-owning utilities in Minnesota and
the surrounding region to expand the electric transmission
grid to ensure continued reliable and affordable service.
The new transmission lines will be built in phases
designed to meet this increasing demand as well as
to support renewable energy expansion.
- Bemidji-Grand Rapids, 68 miles,
230 kV
- Fargo-St. Cloud, about 210 miles,
345 kV
- Monticello-St. Cloud, about 28
miles, 345 kV
- Hampton-Rochester-La Crosse, 150
miles, 345 kV
- Brookings County-Hampton, 250
miles, 345 kV
The CapX2020 utilities - investor-owned,
electric cooperatives and municipals - include those
that serve the majority of customers in Minnesota
and the surrounding region.
For more information,
see the CapX2020
proposed transmission line projects fact sheet.
2. Why are these lines being proposed?
The Upper Midwest's electric
transmission grid hasn't had a major upgrade in nearly
30 years. Electricity consumption in Minnesota has
nearly doubled since 1980, according to data from
the state's department of commerce. Wisconsin has
seen its energy use grow 2 percent annually during
the past decade; in 2005, residential energy use increased
3 percent, while commercial use grew more than 5 percent.
South Dakota's energy demand and use are projected
to grow 1-2 percent annually during the next 10-15
years. And in North Dakota, electricity consumption
increased 3 percent annually from 1980 to 2005.
Our electricity
demand has risen in proportion both to the growing
number of electronic items and appliances we depend
on and to the increasing size of our homes. For example,
in 2007, the average household had 25 consumer electronic
products, such as computers, DVD players, video game
consoles, cordless phones, digital cameras and high-definition
televisions; in 1975, the average household had less
than two (Consumer Electronics Association). The average
single-family home in the Midwest is nearly 45 percent
larger today than it was in 1980 (2008 Buildings Energy
Data Book).
Additional information
on how Americans are using more electricity can be
found in the Electricity usage continues to climb
fact sheet.
3. Where will the energy that flows on
the new lines come from?
Due
to the transmission grid's interconnected nature as
well as to electricity's nature - it flows like water
in a stream - it's generally difficult to identify
a specific source of electricity on the grid.
The proposed CapX2020
transmission lines will serve the region's expected
growth and help begin to meet Minnesota's Renewable
Energy Standard (RES), which requires utilities to
deliver 25 percent of their electricity from renewable
sources by 2025 (Xcel Energy is mandated to deliver
30 percent by 2020, with 25 percent from wind). Wisconsin has a 10 percent mandate by 2015. Most
of that energy comes from wind turbines.
4. Will wind energy be on the new lines?
Minnesota ranks ninth
in the country for wind energy potential (North Dakota
is first and South Dakota is fourth), much of which
is located along the Buffalo Ridge in southern and
southwest Minnesota. The Buffalo Ridge extends from
Iowa through Minnesota and the Dakotas. The Brookings
County-Hampton 345 kV line will expand access to these
rich wind resources by adding about 700 MW of capacity
to the transmission grid. That line, along with other
projects recently completed or currently under construction
or in the planning stages, has the potential to add
nearly 2,000 MW of wind capacity to the transmission
grid. It's estimated Minnesota needs about 5,000 MW
of renewable energy to meet the RES, one of the nation's
most aggressive renewable energy laws.
5. Who will benefit from the transmission
improvements?
All electricity customers
in Minnesota and the surrounding region will benefit
from a more robust and reliable electric transmission
system. CapX2020 will address potentially serious
local reliability issues in the Rochester, St. Cloud,
La Crosse and Alexandria areas. Reliable and affordable
electricity is the backbone to a robust economy and
vibrant community. The expansion of the renewable
energy industry in Minnesota will also benefit the
entire state and region.
6. How will I find out if my property potentially
is affected?
In July 2007, the CapX2020
utilities mailed 73,000 notice letters to landowners
in three 345 kV transmission line "notice study
corridors." The letters explained the project
and briefed landowners on how to become involved.
To date, the utilities have hosted nearly 100 open houses
and 33 routing work group meetings throughout the
345 kV corridors to inform landowners, local governments
and other interested parties about the project and
gather land use information. The CapX2020 utilities
have also sent out more than 500,000 direct mail pieces
and placed nearly 300 ads in local newspapers.
7. How can I get involved?
You can provide comments
to the utilities on both routing and need on the www.CapX2020.com
home page or by sending letters to or calling the
project contacts (click on project links above for
contact information). All comments, information and
suggestions are valued and taken into consideration
when developing proposals.
The CapX2020 utilities have submitted the required regulatory permits in Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wisconsin. Visit their websites at:
8. What can landowners who host any new
transmission lines expect in the form of compensation?
The CapX2020 utilities
will provide fair compensation in the form of a one-time
easement payment to property owners who host power
lines. Property owners retain ownership of the land
and may continue to use the land around transmission
structures. For more information on transmission line
easements, see the Understanding
easements and rights-of-way fact sheet.
9. What do transmission structures look
like?
Single-pole structures for the three 345 kV lines are proposed. Steel H-frame structures are being used for the Bemidji-Grand Rapids 230 kV line. H-frame structures
are two wood or steel poles with cross bracing and
conductor supports. They can be embedded in the ground
without a foundation and vary in height from 75 to
150 feet; spans between structures range from 600
to 900 feet. The following fact sheet provides photos
of the types of structures: Proposed
transmission line infrastructure fact sheet.
10. Will the new lines be safe?
Yes. Every effort is made to ensure
safety in construction, operation and maintenance
of transmission lines. Lines and line infrastructure
are designed to withstand extreme weather conditions.
Protective devices at line terminals stop the electricity
flow under any abnormal operating circumstances. Utility
practices meet or exceed standards set by national
electric safety codes as well as those adopted by
local governments.
11. What about EMF?
Electric and magnetic
fields (EMF), are created by anything that conducts
electricity, including transmission lines, household
appliances and business equipment. These fields are
strongest closest to their source, so the farther
away you are from the source, the less EMF reaches
your body. EMF exposure from transmission lines, which
are high in the air and outside the negotiated easement,
is minimal. More detailed information on EMF is located
here: http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/
Decades of scientific and medical
research, reviewed by science organizations and government
agencies, have found no cause/effect evidence of threats
to human health from EMF.
For more information,
as well as an extensive list of references, review
a booklet prepared by the National Institute of Environmental
Health Services, National Institute of Health, at
www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/emf/
12. Why not build the new lines underground?
The utilities are proposing
overhead lines because of reliability and cost. While
it is common for lower voltage transmission lines
to be buried (lines less than 69 kV), it is rare
to build high voltage transmission lines underground.
Underground high-voltage transmission lines generally
cost up to 10 times more than overhead high-voltage
lines; that’s a cost impact Minnesota, North
and South Dakota and Wisconsin customers cannot bear.
The technology to build lines underground for long
distances is also extremely difficult to manage.
With overhead lines, air cools the lines and keeps
them at a safe operating temperature. Underground
lines require cooling mechanisms, which increases
cost and decreases reliability. Locating and repairing
underground line failures also takes longer, leading
to longer outages. Installing underground high voltage
transmission lines requires lengthy, disruptive construction
techniques. Design concerns such as capacity and
heat dissipation are frequent limitations. Underground
systems are justified primarily in heavily populated
downtown urban centers, where right-of-way is severely
limited for overhead lines.
13. When will the lines be built?
Line construction started in 2011 and is expected to continue through 2015. The Certificate
of Need (CN) application for the three 345 kV lines
was filed with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
(MN PUC) in August 2007; it was granted in May 2009.
A CoN application was filed for the Bemidji-Grand
Rapids 230 kV project in March 2008; it was granted
in July 2009.
Route Permit applications were filed with the MN PUC for the following:
- Bemidji-Grand Rapids 230 kV project – filed July 4, 2008; granted November 5, 2010; project construction started in summer 2011
- Brookings County-Hampton project – filed December 29, 2008; granted September 14, 2010 and March 1, 2011; construction will start in April 2012
- Hampton-Rochester-La Crosse project – filed January 19, 2010; administrative law judge route recommendation February 8, 2012
- Fargo-St. Cloud project – filed October 1, 2009; granted June 10, 2011; construction started near Alexandria in early 2012
- Monticello-St. Cloud project – filed April 8, 2009; granted July 12, 2010; energized and placed in service in December 2011
A Facility Permit was filed November 22, 2010 with the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission for the Brookings County-Hampton project; it was granted June 14, 2011.
A joint Certificate of Corridor Compatibility and Route Permit application was filed October 3, 2011 with the North Dakota Public Service Commission for the Fargo-St. Cloud project.
A Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity was filed January 3, 2011 with the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin for the Hampton-Rochester-La Crosse project.
Schedules can change, so please continue to check the CapX2020 website and read
your local newspaper and project newsletters for updates. The CapX2020 utilities
will publish meeting notices in newspapers and on the project website.
14. How much will the lines cost? Will
my bills go up?
The Group 1 projects are estimated to cost $1.7 billion plus an additional $200 million for upsizing to double circuit capable structures. Transmission costs generally make up 7 to 10 percent of a customer's bill. In that case, Xcel Energy customers can expect an incremental increase to around $2 per month at the peak of construction (2013-2014). In December 2011, the Brookings County-Hampton project was approved as a multi-value project, meaning project costs will be allocated to all utility customers throughout the Midwest in MISO's footprint.